Play Daze Airy Soft Matte Liquid Blush Chili dupes and alternatives Benefit Cosmetics
4.7 (2,601)·Coral · Warm · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Berry rather than coral· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
54
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than coral · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: sheer· Same format: liquid
Differences: Terracotta rather than coral· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
77
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than coral · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal (skin types)
$27Ulta Beauty(product price)$7 less (21%)4.7 (988)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Peach rather than coral· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Peach rather than coral · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Terracotta rather than coral· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Terracotta rather than coral · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Red rather than coral· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
57
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than coral · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Red rather than coral
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Red rather than coral · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort
Differences: Red rather than coral· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
87
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than coral · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than coral· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than coral · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Differences: Red rather than coral· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
51
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than coral · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Retailer shade note: flushed crimson / tan to deep with warm undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than coral· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than coral · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: liquid· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
87
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: sheer· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Red rather than coral
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Visibly different colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Red rather than coral · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: sheer· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
77
Visibly different colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than coral· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than coral · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: sheer· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Red rather than coral· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Red rather than coral · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Red rather than coral · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Red rather than coral· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Red rather than coral · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Red rather than coral· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Red rather than coral · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Red rather than coral
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Red rather than coral · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Red rather than coral· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Red rather than coral · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal (skin types)
e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Liquid Blush in Gorg Orange, against Benefit Cosmetics Play Daze Airy Soft Matte Liquid Blush in Chili. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeChiliClosest matchGorg OrangeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour55%86#d70310#d52e1dVery close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 3.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100CoralCoralSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall64
Finish50%45MatteDewySome differenceDewy finish rather than matte
Pigmentation25%65SheerBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than sheer
Format25%100LiquidLiquidSameBoth liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 3 compared83
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared85
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%70NormalCombination, Dry, Normal, OilySome differenceBoth marketed for normal skin
Overall match 83/100Shade match 91/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.