Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 Deep 2 dupes and alternatives Bobbi Brown
4.2 (355)·Deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim colour stability· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Same radiant finish· Both claim 12-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
78
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
78
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly lighter· Olive rather than neutral undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Olive rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: D2 - deep with warm undertones, and an olive tone
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
20
Wear & performance
48
Skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
The closest shade to Bobbi Brown Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 Deep 2 (Deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Make Up For Ever Balancing & Perfecting Natural Finish Longwear Foundation in 380N Leather, against Bobbi Brown Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 in Deep 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDeep 2Closest shade match380N LeatherHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%81#8e5015#804b1aClose colourColour difference 3.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%90DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 4.6
Retailer descriptionDeepDeep tanSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 74/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Estée Lauder Futurist Skin Tint Serum Foundation SPF 20 in 5W2 Rich Caramel, against Bobbi Brown Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 in Deep 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDeep 2Closest overall alternative5W2 Rich CaramelHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall82
Colour60%86#8e5015#894b1bVery close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 2.7
Retailer descriptionDeepDeepBoth described as deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Overall match 84/100Shade match 82/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.