Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 Rich 2 dupes and alternatives Bobbi Brown
4.2 (355)·Deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim 12-hour wear· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
89
Skin suitability
20
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin · No SPF
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim 12-hour wear· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
89
Skin suitability
20
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin · No SPF
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim 12-hour wear· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
89
Skin suitability
20
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin · No SPF
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
89
Skin suitability
20
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin · No SPF
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim 12-hour wear· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
89
Skin suitability
20
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin · No SPF
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 8-hour wear
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry skin · No SPF
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
40
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/normal skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: ultra deep with neutral-warm undertones
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
The closest shade to Bobbi Brown Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 Rich 2 (Deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Haus Labs Triclone Skin Tech Medium Coverage Foundation in 530 Deep, against Bobbi Brown Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 in Rich 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRich 2Closest shade match530 DeepHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%83#825017#7c491aClose colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 3.7
Retailer descriptionRich deepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 75/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Clinique Even Better Clinical Vitamin Makeup Broad Spectrum SPF 45 Foundation in Deep Cool 1, against Bobbi Brown Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 in Rich 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRich 2Closest overall alternativeDeep Cool 1How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall72
Colour60%69#825017#7c4d29Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 2.0
Retailer descriptionRich deepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 77/100Shade match 72/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$15 less (31%)
