Airbrush Matte Bronzer Fair dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.3 (602)·Bronze · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Deeper· Brown rather than bronze· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown rather than bronze · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: natural matte finish for fair skin tones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
51
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: Medium to tan with warm undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
42
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Sensitive rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Golden rather than bronze
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
51
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Golden rather than bronze · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: Fair to light with neutral-warm undertones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Golden rather than bronze
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
69
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Golden rather than bronze · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: natural skin-like finish for fair skin tones
DIBS Beauty Duet Baked Bronzer in Vanilla Latte, against Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Matte Bronzer in Fair. Matched on the lighter bronzer pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFairClosest shade matchVanilla LatteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour55%92#e3b593#dcb497Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth25%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family5%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared63
Finish50%45MatteDewySome differenceDewy finish rather than matte
Pigmentation25%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Skin types40%0Normal, Combination, OilySensitiveDifferentMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 76/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Benefit Cosmetics Hoola Matte Powder Bronzer in Lite, against Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Matte Bronzer in Fair. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFairClosest overall alternativeLiteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour55%99#e3b593#e3b594Looks identicalColour difference 0.3 (0 is identical)
Depth25%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 86/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $3 more
