Airbrush Matte Bronzer Refill Tan dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.3 (602)·Bronze · Warm · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Rose rather than bronze· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than bronze · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Rose rather than bronze· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than bronze · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Claims comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Golden rather than bronze· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Golden rather than bronze · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Stick rather than powder (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Stick rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: light-medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims comfort
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: tan to deep with warm undertones
Westman Atelier Sun Tone Hydrating Matte Bronzing Drops in Soleil Parfait 2, against Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Matte Bronzer in Refill Tan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRefill TanClosest shade matchSoleil Parfait 2How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour55%98#9d6a54#9b6a53Looks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Depth25%100Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared73
Finish50%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation25%—not comparableNot listedSheerNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%20PowderLiquidDifferentLiquid rather than powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 82/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Dior Forever Nude Bronze in 30 Tan Matte, against Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Matte Bronzer in Refill Tan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRefill TanClosest overall alternative30 Tan MatteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour55%97#9d6a54#a06953Looks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Depth25%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish50%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation25%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 3 compared83
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Combination, OilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 96/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.