Beautiful Skin Medium to Full Coverage Radiant Concealer 11.75 Tan dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.5 (515)·Light · Olive · neutral olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than medium-full coverage
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
87
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than medium-full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: medium tan with warm peach undertones
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (78%)4.3 (8,153)
Matches: Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Satin rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
87
Slight colour difference · Satin · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Satin rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Matches: Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· No fragrance listed
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
87
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than medium-full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: medium tan with neutral peach undertones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Luminous rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Retailer shade note: for medium-tan neutral skin with peach undertones
$10.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$25.01 less (69%)4.1 (2,823)
Matches: Both claim a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Natural finish
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for dry/normal skin
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Luminous rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Retailer shade note: for medium-tan warm skin with golden undertones
Matches: Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Slightly cooler undertone
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
87
Slight colour difference · Satin · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · Satin rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Retailer shade note: tan with cool-neutral undertones
Matches: Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Described as medium, yours as tan· Neutral rather than olive undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Described as medium, yours as tan · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than medium-full coverage
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral beige undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium, yours as tan
Matches: Claims not settling into lines· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium-full coverage
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for medium to tan skin w/ cool undertones
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (78%)4.2 (5,664)
Matches: Both claim 16-hour wear· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: medium tan with golden undertones
Matches: Claims not settling into lines· No fragrance listed
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for medium to tan skin w/ warm undertones
Matches: Both claim a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Natural finish
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for dry/normal skin
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
87
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: Medium Tan with neutral undertones
Matches: Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Described as light, yours as tan
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Described as light, yours as tan · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than medium-full coverage
Retailer shade note: light with neutral undertone
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light, yours as tan
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: medium to tan skin with warm, golden undertones
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Described as light medium, yours as tan
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
87
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Described as light medium, yours as tan · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium-full coverage
Retailer shade note: Light Medium, Warm Golden
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light medium, yours as tan
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Described as medium, yours as tan
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
87
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Described as medium, yours as tan · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium-full coverage
Retailer shade note: Medium, Warm Peach
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium, yours as tan
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
44
Skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Retailer shade note: medium deep with golden peach undertones
Matches: Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Described as medium, yours as tan· Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than medium-full coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
87
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium, yours as tan · Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: M3 - medium to medium-deep with warm undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium, yours as tan
Matches: Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Described as medium, yours as tan· Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than medium-full coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
87
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium, yours as tan · Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than medium-full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: MD1.5 - medium to medium-deep with warm undertones, and a peach tone
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium, yours as tan
The closest shade to Charlotte Tilbury Beautiful Skin Medium to Full Coverage Radiant Concealer 11.75 Tan (Light · Olive · neutral olive undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer in Tan Sand, against Charlotte Tilbury Beautiful Skin Medium to Full Coverage Radiant Concealer in 11.75 Tan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade11.75 TanClosest matchTan SandHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%78#ffb173#f4b786Close colourColour difference 3.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference: 0.7
Retailer descriptionTanTanBoth described as tanThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared70
Finish35%78RadiantSatinCloseSatin finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%80Medium-fullFullCloseFull coverage rather than medium-full
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall87
Skin type100%87Dry, normalDry, combination, normalBoth marketed for dry/normal skin
Overall match 80/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraSame price
View at Target