Hollywood Contour Wand Deep dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.3 (3,104)·Brown · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar contour overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Mauve rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Mauve rather than brown · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format)
Retailer shade note: shadow for deep skin tones with neutral to rosy undertones
Anastasia Beverly Hills Smooth Blur Cream Contour Stick in Subtone, against Charlotte Tilbury Hollywood Contour Wand in Deep. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDeepClosest matchSubtoneHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour50%77#271811#281f1aClose colourColour difference 4.0 (0 is identical)
Depth25%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared78
Finish60%89SatinNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than satin
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedSheerNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format20%45LiquidStickSome differenceStick rather than liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 85/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.