Hollywood Contour Wand Tan-Deep dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.3 (3,104)·Brown · Neutral · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar contour overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar contour on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Bronze rather than brown· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than brown · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as contour (suited)
DIBS Beauty GlowTour Duo Shimmering Blush + Contour Stick in Venus, against Charlotte Tilbury Hollywood Contour Wand in Tan-Deep. Matched on pan 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTan-DeepClosest shade matchVenusHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour50%92#3f1d18#401b13Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth25%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNeutralNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared70
Finish60%78SatinDewyCloseDewy finish rather than satin
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format20%45LiquidStickSome differenceStick rather than liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 79/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Rare Beauty Soft Pinch Liquid Contour in Peaceful, against Charlotte Tilbury Hollywood Contour Wand in Tan-Deep. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTan-DeepClosest overall alternativePeacefulHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour50%72#3f1d18#422214Close colourColour difference 4.7 (0 is identical)
Depth25%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.