K.I.S.S.I.N.G Satin Shine Lipstick Night Crimson dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.3 (1,641)·Red · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: satin· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than red· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than red · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Pink rather than red· Glossy rather than satin (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
60
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Glossy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than red · Glossy rather than satin (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Maybelline SuperStay Matte Ink Liquid Lipstick in Savant, against Charlotte Tilbury K.I.S.S.I.N.G Satin Shine Lipstick in Night Crimson. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNight CrimsonClosest shade matchSavantHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall84
Colour60%95#a63356#a53b59Looks identicalColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 1.7 on the 0–100 scale
Finish55%78SatinMatteCloseMatte finish rather than satin
Opacity45%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared48
Longevity60%486-hour wear16-hour wearSome difference16-hour wear claimed against 6-hour wear
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall · 1 of 2 compared40
Comfort50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 74/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
NARS Afterglow Lipstick in Turned On 321, against Charlotte Tilbury K.I.S.S.I.N.G Satin Shine Lipstick in Night Crimson. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNight CrimsonClosest overall alternativeTurned On 321How they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall75
Colour60%58#a63356#9f3a45Slight colour differenceColour difference 6.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100RedRedSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Finish55%—not comparableSatinNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Overall match 79/100Shade match 75/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.