K.I.S.S.I.N.G Satin Shine Lipstick Pillow Talk Fair dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.3 (1,641)·Pink · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same longevity: 6-hour wear· Both claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
44
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than pink · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Differences: Deeper· Warm rather than cool undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Warm rather than cool undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: baby pink with a matte finish
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: satin· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Rose rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Rose rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: satin· Claims transfer resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: satin· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Huda Beauty Liquid Matte Mousse Soft Blur Lip Cream in Baby Pink, against Charlotte Tilbury K.I.S.S.I.N.G Satin Shine Lipstick in Pillow Talk Fair. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePillow Talk FairClosest matchBaby PinkHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall97
Colour60%94#e3918e#dd938eVery close colourColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared78
Finish55%78SatinMatteCloseMatte finish rather than satin
Opacity45%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared40
Longevity60%406-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall40
Comfort50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 82/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.