Unreal Skin Sheer Glow Tint Hydrating Foundation Stick 3 Fair dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.2 (2,035)·Light · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: Light skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: Light skin with beige undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
67
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: fair with neutral to rosy undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
67
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for dry skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry skin
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$32 less (67%)4.3 (2,230)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Full rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
90
Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
39
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: fair to light with peach/yellow undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
The closest shade to Charlotte Tilbury Unreal Skin Sheer Glow Tint Hydrating Foundation Stick 3 Fair (Light · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
MAC Cosmetics Studio Fix Powder Plus Foundation in NC18, against Charlotte Tilbury Unreal Skin Sheer Glow Tint Hydrating Foundation Stick in 3 Fair. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade3 FairClosest shade matchNC18How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#efb98f#ecb78eLooks identicalColour difference 0.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference: 1.2
Retailer descriptionFairNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish35%12RadiantMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%20LightFullDifferentFull coverage rather than light
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared63
Longevity30%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims colour stability (no oxidation); your product does not list it
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, combinationNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for normal/combination skin
Overall match 75/100Shade match 99/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation in 14 Fair, against Charlotte Tilbury Unreal Skin Sheer Glow Tint Hydrating Foundation Stick in 3 Fair. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade3 FairClosest overall alternative14 FairHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%96#efb98f#f2bb94Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference: 1.2
Retailer descriptionFairFairBoth described as fairThe retailers describe the same depth
Overall match 89/100Shade match 89/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraSame price
Target
