Unreal Skin Sheer Glow Tint Hydrating Foundation Stick 7 Medium dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.2 (2,035)·Light medium · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
90
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Same light coverage
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
67
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for combination skin
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: Medium skin with a neutral undertone
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
90
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium skin with golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Full rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
90
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same radiant finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal skin
Retailer shade note: medium with warm golden-olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal skin
Retailer shade note: medium with warm golden-olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal skin
Retailer shade note: medium with warm olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same radiant finish
Differences: Full rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium skin with neutral undertones
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$36.01 less (75%)4.4 (182,841)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
36
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
30
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for normal/dry/combination skin · Contains drying alcohol
The closest shade to Charlotte Tilbury Unreal Skin Sheer Glow Tint Hydrating Foundation Stick 7 Medium (Light medium · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
about-face THE PERFORMER Skin-Focused Foundation in M1PEACH, against Charlotte Tilbury Unreal Skin Sheer Glow Tint Hydrating Foundation Stick in 7 Medium. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade7 MediumClosest matchM1PEACHHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%90#f2a679#f1a16cVery close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Overall match 88/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.