Chubby Stick Eye Shadow Tint For Eyes Curvaceous Coal dupes and alternatives Clinique
4.5 (1,604)·Grey · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Same skin types: sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Berry rather than grey· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than grey · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Berry rather than grey· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than grey · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Blue rather than grey· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Blue rather than grey · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Lighter· Mauve rather than grey· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Mauve rather than grey · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$20 less (69%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
22
Wear & performance
28
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same longevity: 8-hour wear· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than grey· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than grey · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
30
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than grey· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than grey · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: mocha brown with gold and silver pearls
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Brown rather than grey· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
30
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown rather than grey · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: shimmering rich walnut brown with hidden pearl
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than grey
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than grey · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Claims hydration· Same skin types: sensitive
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
22
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
e.l.f. Cosmetics Perfect 10 Eyeshadow Palette in Nude Rose Gold, against Clinique Chubby Stick Eye Shadow Tint For Eyes in Curvaceous Coal. Matched on pan 7. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCurvaceous CoalClosest shade matchNude Rose GoldHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%93#624c4f#5c484aVery close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 2.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreyGreySameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall22
Finish65%5MetallicMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%35StickPaletteDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%408-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 65/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Sephora Collection Sephora Colorful Waterproof Eyeshadow & Eyeliner Multi-Stick in 09 Espresso Matte, against Clinique Chubby Stick Eye Shadow Tint For Eyes in Curvaceous Coal. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCurvaceous CoalClosest overall alternative09 Espresso MatteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%76#624c4f#594947Close colourColour difference 4.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 2.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreyGreySameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared69
Longevity50%808-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 8-hour wear
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 82/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.