Chubby Stick Eye Shadow Tint For Eyes Lavish Lilac dupes and alternatives Clinique
4.5 (1,604)·Purple · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
30
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$23 less (79%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: stick· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than purple· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
57
Slight colour difference · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than purple · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Dry, Oily, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: burgundy metallic with taupe shimmer/copper rose foil with shifts of pink and gold sparkle
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$20 less (69%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: medium bluish lavender shimmer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: light purple with gold glitter
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Mauve rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Mauve rather than purple · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
30
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Blue rather than purple· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
57
Slight colour difference · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Blue rather than purple · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Dry, Oily, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: smoky steel metallic with gunmetal shimmer/
holographic opal foil with indigo & liliac sparkle
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than purple· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than purple · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Same skin types: sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$18Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (38%)3.5 (165)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Mauve rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Mauve rather than purple · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$22 less (76%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same cool undertone
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: metallic vivid violet with a blue duochrome flip
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Plum rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Plum rather than purple · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Kaja Eye Bento Bouncy Eyeshadow Trio in Taro Bubble Tea, against Clinique Chubby Stick Eye Shadow Tint For Eyes in Lavish Lilac. Matched on pan 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLavish LilacClosest shade matchTaro Bubble TeaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#a28a97#a08a97Looks identicalColour difference 0.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PurplePurpleSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared76
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35StickPaletteDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%408-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
IT Cosmetics Superhero No-Tug Longwear Eyeshadow Stick in Epic Amethyst, against Clinique Chubby Stick Eye Shadow Tint For Eyes in Lavish Lilac. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLavish LilacClosest overall alternativeEpic AmethystHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%86#a28a97#ac8d9dVery close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PurplePurpleSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall90
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Longevity50%608-hour wear16-hour wearSome difference16-hour wear claimed against 8-hour wear
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%100SensitiveSensitiveSameBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 87/100Shade match 91/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.