Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser WN 04 Bone dupes and alternatives Clinique
4.0 (1,308)·Very fair · Neutral · neutral golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for very fair skin with neutral warm undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
33
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very fair skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly deeper· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
33
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: fair skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: Fair with neutral warm undertones
Matches: Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: Fair with netural warm undertones
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Olive rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
28
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Olive rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Not marketed for normal/oily skin
The closest shade to Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser WN 04 Bone (Very fair · Neutral · neutral golden undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
L'Oréal Paris True Match Radiant Serum Concealer in C2, against Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser in WN 04 Bone. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWN 04 BoneClosest shade matchC2How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%83#fbe2bf#ffe7cdClose colourColour difference 3.2 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared48
Finish35%56NaturalRadiantSome differenceRadiant finish rather than natural
Coverage30%—not comparableMediumNot listedNot comparedCoverage not listed for one product
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared82
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall0
Skin type100%0Normal, dry, oilySensitiveMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 72/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Too Faced Born This Way Super Coverage Multi-Use Concealer in Swan, against Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser in WN 04 Bone. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWN 04 BoneClosest overall alternativeSwanHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%75#fbe2bf#fde1c8Close colourColour difference 4.3 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared81
Finish35%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Coverage30%80MediumFullCloseFull coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared82
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, oilyNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/dry skin
Overall match 80/100Shade match 81/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $10 more
View at Walmart
