Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser WN 114 Golden dupes and alternatives Clinique
4.0 (1,308)·Medium · Neutral · neutral golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (64%)4.3 (8,153)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Satin rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Satin · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Satin rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: deep with rosy cool undertones
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (64%)4.3 (8,153)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Satin rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Satin · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Satin rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: deep with rosy cool undertones
Matches: Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: tan to deep skin with warm, golden undertones
Matches: Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: tan to deep skin with warm, peach undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
$16.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$5.01 less (23%)4.4 (832)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Radiant rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/dry/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
$15.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$6.01 less (27%)4.2 (1,617)
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
$15.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$6.01 less (27%)4.2 (1,617)
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$9.01 less (41%)4.2 (11,365)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
51
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for normal/dry/oily skin
$15.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$6.01 less (27%)4.2 (1,617)
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
The closest shade to Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser WN 114 Golden (Medium · Neutral · neutral golden undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
IT Cosmetics Bye Bye Under Eye Full Coverage Anti-Aging Water-Resistant Concealer in 40.0 Deep Tan, against Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser in WN 114 Golden. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWN 114 GoldenClosest shade match40.0 Deep TanHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%90#c68f66#bf8c6aVery close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Overall match 82/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Hydrating Face and Under-Eye Concealer in 11.5, against Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser in WN 114 Golden. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWN 114 GoldenClosest overall alternative11.5How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%88#c68f66#ce8c5eVery close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 0.1
Retailer descriptionDeepDeepBoth described as deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish35%56NaturalRadiantSome differenceRadiant finish rather than natural
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared100
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Normal, dry, oilyNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 85/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $20 more
Ulta Beauty
View at CVS
