Chrome Liquid Eyeshadow Bliss dupes and alternatives ColourPop
4.6 (1,219)·Golden · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Copper rather than golden· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than golden · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than golden· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than golden · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than golden· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than golden · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Rose rather than golden· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than golden · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Peach rather than golden· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Peach rather than golden · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Terracotta rather than golden· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
58
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than golden · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than golden· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than golden · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Pink rather than golden· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than golden · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Copper rather than golden· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
58
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than golden · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Peach rather than golden· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Peach rather than golden · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Pink rather than golden· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than golden · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering medium pink / a blackened cherry
Differences: Pink rather than golden· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than golden · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Deeper· Brown rather than golden· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown rather than golden · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (50%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Claims crease resistance
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than golden· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than golden · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Marc Jacobs Beauty Born Star Cream-to-Powder Long-Wear Eyeshadow in 210 Clapback, against ColourPop Chrome Liquid Eyeshadow in Bliss. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBlissClosest match210 ClapbackHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%87#cf8b85#d0948cVery close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94MediumLightCloseDepth difference 3.4 on the 0–100 scale
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%20LiquidPowderDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%40Not listed14-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 79/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.