Chrome Liquid Eyeshadow Sweetzer Ave dupes and alternatives ColourPop
4.6 (1,219)·Green · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Golden rather than green· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than green · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than green· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than green · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Bronze rather than green· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than green · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (50%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Claims crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than green· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than green · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Peach rather than green· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than green · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than green· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
54
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than green · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: champagne gold that reflects pink
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Copper rather than green· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than green · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 14-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Golden rather than green· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Golden rather than green · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than green· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than green · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Golden rather than green· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than green · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Deeper· Terracotta rather than green· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Terracotta rather than green · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Nude rather than green· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
58
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than green · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Copper rather than green· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
58
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than green · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Golden rather than green· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than green · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Golden rather than green· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
58
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than green · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$0.01 less (0%)4.6 (13,914)
Matches: Claims crease resistance
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Bronze rather than green· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
58
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Bronze rather than green · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Golden rather than green· Matte rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
4
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than green · Matte rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
NYX Professional Makeup Lid Lingerie Cream Eye Pigment in Gold String, against ColourPop Chrome Liquid Eyeshadow in Sweetzer Ave. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSweetzer AveClosest shade matchGold StringHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%87#edad88#f4a986Very close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 73/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Ulta Beauty Collection Solar Flare Gel Chrome Eyeshadow in Sun Glow, against ColourPop Chrome Liquid Eyeshadow in Sweetzer Ave. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSweetzer AveClosest overall alternativeSun GlowHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall70
Colour60%77#edad88#dbab8eClose colourColour difference 4.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94LightLightSameDepth difference 3.2 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 74/100Shade match 70/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautySame price
Sephora
