TruNaked Eyeshadow Palette Chocoholic 845 dupes and alternatives CoverGirl
4.2 (14,130)
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Claims waterproof
Differences: Berry rather than plum· Stick rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than plum · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: White rather than golden· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than golden · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: matte cream with subtle pink undertones
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
34
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: white chocolate, rosy velvet, & brownie bite
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Bobbi Brown Long-Wear Waterproof Cream Eyeshadow Stick in Downtown Brown, against CoverGirl TruNaked Eyeshadow Palette in Chocoholic 845. Compared using pan 3 of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeChocoholic 845Closest shade matchDowntown BrownHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%96#92685a#936857Looks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall31
Finish65%20MatteShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 74/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Jane Iredale PurePressed Eye Shadow Triple in Riverstone, against CoverGirl TruNaked Eyeshadow Palette in Chocoholic 845. Matched on pan 3, against pan 4 of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeChocoholic 845Closest overall alternativeRiverstoneHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%91#4f4138#4d433cVery close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BlackBlackSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared81
Longevity50%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 92/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $8.01 more
Target
