TruNaked Eyeshadow Palette Smokey dupes and alternatives CoverGirl
4.2 (14,130)
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims hydration
Differences: Grey rather than black· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Grey rather than black · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: matte deep grey with cool undertones
Differences: Deeper· Stick rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matched on the lighter eyeshadow pan, against pan 1 of your shade
73
overall
Shade match95
$42SephoraCosts $32.22 more4.0 (616)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$0.78 less (8%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Green rather than grey· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Green rather than grey · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Glitter rather than matte (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish, pigmentation & format
7
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Nuit, against CoverGirl TruNaked Eyeshadow Palette in Smokey. Compared using pan 4 of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSmokeyClosest shade matchNuitHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%96#484a57#494954Looks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreyGreySameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall38
Finish65%20MatteShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than matte
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 78/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Jane Iredale PurePressed Eye Shadow Triple in Brown Sugar, against CoverGirl TruNaked Eyeshadow Palette in Smokey. Matched on pan 1, against pan 7 of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSmokeyClosest overall alternativeBrown SugarHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%86#554747#53494dVery close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreyGreySameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared81
Longevity50%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 91/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $13.22 more
Sephora
