Colorfix Stix - Multi-Use Pearl Pigment Stick for Eye, Cheek & Lip Duo #4 Apollo & Artemis dupes and alternatives Danessa Myricks Beauty
4.5 (441)·Brown · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$23 less (61%)4.0 (271)
Metallic · Opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Nude rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
28
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Nude rather than brown · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than brown· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
33
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than brown · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Sensitive rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
33
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than brown · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Sensitive rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Grey rather than brown· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Grey rather than brown · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than brown· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
28
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than brown · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than brown· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
32
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 45% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than brown · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: sparkling gold with multi-colored pearl
e.l.f. Cosmetics Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow in Tan-talize, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix Stix - Multi-Use Pearl Pigment Stick for Eye, Cheek & Lip in Duo #4 Apollo & Artemis. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDuo #4 Apollo & ArtemisClosest matchTan-talizeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall71
Colour60%55#a58a66#bc906dSlight colour differenceColour difference 6.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%86Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 5.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%100GlitterGlitterSameSame glitter finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedSheerNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared83
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDry, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 76/100Shade match 71/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$31 less (82%)
Sephora
