Colorfix Stix - Multi-Use Pearl Pigment Stick for Eye, Cheek & Lip Duo #4 Apollo & Artemis dupes and alternatives Danessa Myricks Beauty
4.5 (441)·Brown · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than brown· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than brown · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: warm bronze with silver, gold and copper sparkle
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than stick (format)· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
28
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering warm taupe / a shimmering blackened green
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$23 less (61%)4.0 (271)
Metallic · Opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Bronze rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Bronze rather than brown · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than brown· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
28
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than brown · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering golden copper / a warm beige brown
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Terracotta rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Terracotta rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Nude rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
28
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Nude rather than brown · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
$23Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (39%)4.3 (828)
Metallic · Opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Copper rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Copper rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than brown· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
33
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than brown · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Sensitive rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
33
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than brown · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Sensitive rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Grey rather than brown· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Grey rather than brown · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than brown· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
28
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than brown · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than brown· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
32
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 45% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than brown · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: sparkling gold with multi-colored pearl
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Lighter· Taupe rather than brown· Matte rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
8
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Taupe rather than brown · Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Stila Liqua-Play Eye Shadow in Fawn Matte, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix Stix - Multi-Use Pearl Pigment Stick for Eye, Cheek & Lip in Duo #4 Apollo & Artemis. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDuo #4 Apollo & ArtemisClosest shade matchFawn MatteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall76
Colour60%60#a58a66#b08769Slight colour differenceColour difference 6.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared8
Finish65%0GlitterMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%45StickLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall70
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableDry, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 53/100Shade match 76/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
e.l.f. Cosmetics Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow in Tan-talize, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix Stix - Multi-Use Pearl Pigment Stick for Eye, Cheek & Lip in Duo #4 Apollo & Artemis. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDuo #4 Apollo & ArtemisClosest overall alternativeTan-talizeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall71
Colour60%55#a58a66#bc906dSlight colour differenceColour difference 6.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%86Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 5.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%100GlitterGlitterSameSame glitter finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedSheerNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared83
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDry, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 76/100Shade match 71/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$31 less (82%)
