Colorfix Stix - Multi-Use Pearl Pigment Stick for Eye, Cheek & Lip Duo #6 Celeste & Nova dupes and alternatives Danessa Myricks Beauty
4.5 (441)·Taupe · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than taupe· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than taupe · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: stick
Differences: Peach rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
35
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
33
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Sensitive rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Lighter· Rose rather than taupe· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Rose rather than taupe · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Golden rather than taupe· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Golden rather than taupe · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: light champagne gold with silver sparkle
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
35
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Mauve rather than taupe· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
28
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Mauve rather than taupe · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering taupe with silver, pink & gold sparkle / a neutral taupe
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Rose rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
58
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Silver rather than taupe· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
35
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Silver rather than taupe · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Silver rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Silver rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: cool neutral with silver pearl
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Peach rather than taupe· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Peach rather than taupe · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Nude rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
35
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Nude rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Golden rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Matte rather than duochrome (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
19
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Matte rather than duochrome (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Sensitive rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Matte rather than duochrome (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
7
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Matte rather than duochrome (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Rare Beauty All of the Above Weightless Eyeshadow Stick in Contentment, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix Stix - Multi-Use Pearl Pigment Stick for Eye, Cheek & Lip in Duo #6 Celeste & Nova. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDuo #6 Celeste & NovaClosest shade matchContentmentHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%89#c09f97#b8978eVery close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%90LightMediumCloseDepth difference 4.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared44
Finish65%31DuochromeDewyDifferentDewy finish rather than duochrome
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall82
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDry, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 74/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Metallic Taupe, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix Stix - Multi-Use Pearl Pigment Stick for Eye, Cheek & Lip in Duo #6 Celeste & Nova. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%28Dry, Oily, SensitiveNormal, Dry, CombinationDifferentBoth marketed for dry skin
Overall match 80/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.