Colorfix Stix - Multi-Use Pearl Pigment Stick for Eye, Cheek & Lip Duo #1 Mystic Taupe & Interstellar dupes and alternatives Danessa Myricks Beauty
4.5 (441)·Taupe · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Silver rather than taupe· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
35
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than taupe · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Lighter· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Silver rather than taupe· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Combination rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
95
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than taupe · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: metallic pewter silver with sparkling reflects
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
28
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering golden copper / a warm beige brown
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
28
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Deeper· Brown rather than taupe· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown rather than taupe · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: Earthy Glam (taupe beige glitter), Wood Breeze (olive beige brown shimmer), Night Haze (deep khaki brown matte)
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
28
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering neutral beige / a rich navy blue
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
58
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
35
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than taupe· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than taupe · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Lighter· Rose rather than taupe· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Rose rather than taupe · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Sensitive rather than dry, oily, sensitive (skin types)
$10.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$27.50 less (72%)4.2 (1,248)
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$29 less (76%)4.2 (2,863)
Matte · Buildable
Differences: Matte rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
7
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Rare Beauty Soft Pinch Liquid Contour in Gentle, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix Stix - Multi-Use Pearl Pigment Stick for Eye, Cheek & Lip in Duo #1 Mystic Taupe & Interstellar. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
Colour60%83#b89d91#b59485Close colourColour difference 3.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%91LightLightSameDepth difference 4.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared8
Finish65%0DuochromeNaturalDifferentNatural finish rather than duochrome
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%45StickLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall70
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared37
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%33Dry, Oily, SensitiveSensitiveDifferentBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 60/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Metallic Taupe, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix Stix - Multi-Use Pearl Pigment Stick for Eye, Cheek & Lip in Duo #1 Mystic Taupe & Interstellar. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%28Dry, Oily, SensitiveNormal, Dry, CombinationDifferentBoth marketed for dry skin
Overall match 81/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$16 less (42%)
