Yummy Skin Soothing Serum Skin Tint Foundation 16 dupes and alternatives Danessa Myricks Beauty
4.3 (1,515)·Rich deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Buildable rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same radiant finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
33
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: Deep to rich neutral undertone
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: dark deep with warm undertone
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Claims colour stability· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: dark deep with warm undertone
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for normal skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
20
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
The closest shade to Danessa Myricks Beauty Yummy Skin Soothing Serum Skin Tint Foundation 16 (Rich deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Hourglass Ambient Soft Glow Foundation in 17.5, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Yummy Skin Soothing Serum Skin Tint Foundation in 16. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade16Closest match17.5How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#463226#462f22Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Overall match 88/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$1 less (3%)
