Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$36Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (14%)4.5 (515)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium-full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium-full rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: fair/medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Claims not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Olive rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
70
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Olive rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: light medium with warm olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
$31Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (26%)4.3 (1,273)
Matches: Claims not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Luminous rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Luminous · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Luminous rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: for light neutral skin with peach undertones
The closest shade to Dior Forever Skin Correct Full-Coverage Concealer 2W Warm (Light medium · Warm undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Hydrating Face and Under-Eye Concealer in 4, against Dior Forever Skin Correct Full-Coverage Concealer in 2W Warm. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade2W WarmClosest shade match4How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#dcb189#ddb389Looks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Finish35%56NaturalRadiantSome differenceRadiant finish rather than natural
Coverage30%80FullMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared54
Longevity30%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50NormalNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 79/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Haus Labs Triclone Skin Tech Hydrating + De-puffing Concealer in 10 Light Golden, against Dior Forever Skin Correct Full-Coverage Concealer in 2W Warm. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade2W WarmClosest overall alternative10 Light GoldenHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#dcb189#d8b088Looks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared81
Finish35%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Coverage30%80FullMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared54
Longevity30%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall73
Skin type100%73NormalNormal, dry, oilyBoth marketed for normal skin
Overall match 86/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$12 less (29%)
