Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$29.01 less (69%)4.3 (3,814)
Matches: Same full coverage· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
$16.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$25.01 less (60%)4.4 (832)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Radiant rather than natural finish· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Radiant rather than natural finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: light to medium with a golden undertone
$16.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$25.01 less (60%)4.4 (832)
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Claims not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal skin · Contains drying alcohol
The closest shade to Dior Forever Skin Correct Full-Coverage Concealer 4 Neutral (Medium · Neutral undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
CoverGirl TruBlend Undercover Concealer in Golden Amber, against Dior Forever Skin Correct Full-Coverage Concealer in 4 Neutral. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade4 NeutralClosest shade matchGolden AmberHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%98#c79070#c8906eLooks identicalColour difference 0.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 0.1
Retailer descriptionLight mediumNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 4 compared76
Finish35%56NaturalMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than natural
Coverage30%100FullFullSameSame full coverage
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared58
Longevity30%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50NormalNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 80/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
IT Cosmetics Bye Bye Under Eye Full Coverage Anti-Aging Water-Resistant Concealer in 32 Tan Bronze, against Dior Forever Skin Correct Full-Coverage Concealer in 4 Neutral. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade4 NeutralClosest overall alternative32 Tan BronzeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%92#c79070#cf936eVery close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 2.2
Retailer descriptionLight mediumNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 4 compared100
Finish35%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Coverage30%100FullFullSameSame full coverage
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared53
Longevity30%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall68
Skin type100%68NormalNormal, dry, combination, oily, sensitiveBoth marketed for normal skin
Overall match 84/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.