Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Claims not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly lighter· Warm rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Warm rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
$31Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (26%)4.3 (1,273)
Matches: Claims not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly lighter· Warm rather than olive undertone· Luminous rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Luminous · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Warm rather than olive undertone · Luminous rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: for light warm skin with yellow undertones
$31Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (26%)4.3 (1,273)
Matches: Claims not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Luminous rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Luminous · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Luminous rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: for light neutral skin with peach undertones
Matches: Claims not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
The closest shade to Dior Forever Skin Correct Full-Coverage Concealer 3WO Warm Olive (Medium light · Olive · warm olive undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Glossier Stretch Concealer for Dewy Buildable Coverage in Medium Tan 2, against Dior Forever Skin Correct Full-Coverage Concealer in 3WO Warm Olive. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade3WO Warm OliveClosest shade matchMedium Tan 2How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%88#d2a67a#ca9d72Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 4 compared67
Finish35%56NaturalRadiantSome differenceRadiant finish rather than natural
Coverage30%80FullBuildableCloseBuildable coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared51
Longevity30%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50NormalNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 72/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Milk Makeup Future Fluid Longwear Hydrating Concealer in 10W, against Dior Forever Skin Correct Full-Coverage Concealer in 3WO Warm Olive. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade3WO Warm OliveClosest overall alternative10WHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall78
Colour60%74#d2a67a#d49b70Close colourColour difference 4.4 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared79
Finish35%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Coverage30%80FullBuildableCloseBuildable coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared51
Longevity30%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50NormalNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 73/100Shade match 78/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$20 less (48%)
