Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: light to medium with a golden undertone
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Warm rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Warm rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Claims not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Warm rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
70
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Warm rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: light medium with warm peach undertones
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
The closest shade to Dior Forever Skin Correct Full-Coverage Concealer 3WO Warm Olive (Medium light · Olive · warm olive undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Haus Labs Triclone Skin Tech Hydrating + De-puffing Concealer in 10 Light Golden, against Dior Forever Skin Correct Full-Coverage Concealer in 3WO Warm Olive. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade3WO Warm OliveClosest match10 Light GoldenHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%86#d2a67a#d8b088Very close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared81
Finish35%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Coverage30%80FullMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared54
Longevity30%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall73
Skin type100%73NormalNormal, dry, oilyBoth marketed for normal skin
Overall match 79/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$10 less (24%)
View at Ulta Beauty
