Kamo Triple-Peptide Multi-Use Serum Foundation Fair 2C dupes and alternatives Drunk Elephant
4.8 (753)·Fair · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
28
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry/oily skin
Retailer shade note: Extra light with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same full coverage
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· No long-wear claim· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal/dry/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: Very Fair with cool pink undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: for fair skin with rosy undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs cool)· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: Extra light, cool neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
30
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry/oily skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same full coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: very fair beige with neutral undertones for light skin
The closest shade to Drunk Elephant Kamo Triple-Peptide Multi-Use Serum Foundation Fair 2C (Fair · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Temptu Perfect Canvas Foundation in 0.5C Alabaster, against Drunk Elephant Kamo Triple-Peptide Multi-Use Serum Foundation in Fair 2C. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFair 2CClosest shade match0.5C AlabasterHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#efc7af#efc9b2Looks identicalColour difference 0.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99FairFairSameDepth difference: 0.8
Retailer descriptionVery fairVery fairBoth described as very fairThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared84
Finish35%78NaturalNatural matteCloseNatural matte finish rather than natural
Coverage30%80FullBuildableCloseBuildable coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared72
Longevity30%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Normal, dry, oilyNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 89/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Smashbox Always On Skin-Balancing Foundation in F20C, against Drunk Elephant Kamo Triple-Peptide Multi-Use Serum Foundation in Fair 2C. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFair 2CClosest overall alternativeF20CHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%98#efc7af#f3cab2Looks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97FairFairSameDepth difference: 1.7
Retailer descriptionVery fairFairSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 90/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)$1 less (2%)
Sephora
