16HR Camo Concealer Fair Warm dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.2 (5,664)·Fair · Warm · yellow undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same matte finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
77
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: L2 - Very light with neutral undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
77
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: L1 - Very light with neutral undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
77
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: L2.3 - Light with neutral undertones
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly lighter· Radiant rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: very light with neutral peach undertones
The closest shade to e.l.f. Cosmetics 16HR Camo Concealer Fair Warm (Fair · Warm · yellow undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Lancôme Teint Idole Ultra Wear All Over Full Coverage Concealer in 90 Ivoire N, against e.l.f. Cosmetics 16HR Camo Concealer in Fair Warm. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFair WarmClosest match90 Ivoire NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%84#dcd2c6#ebdfd1Close colourColour difference 3.2 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared74
Finish35%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Coverage30%60FullMediumSome differenceMedium coverage rather than full
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared82
Longevity30%6016-hour wear24-hour wearSome difference24-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall28
Skin type100%28Oily, combination, normalDry, combination, sensitiveBoth marketed for combination skin
Overall match 80/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $24 more
