Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims hydration
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim comfort· Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Normal, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: Tan to deep with warm undertones
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than bronze
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: very tan deep with neutral bronze undertones
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format)
Patrick Ta Major Sculpt Crème Contour & Powder Bronzer Duo in She's Chiseled, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Liquid Bronzer & Contour in 1 Fair. Matched on pan 1. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade1 FairClosest shade matchShe's ChiseledHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour55%78#916d51#8b6b59Close colourColour difference 3.9 (0 is identical)
Depth25%98MediumDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 1.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared73
Finish50%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Pigmentation25%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%20LiquidPowderDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 75/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Anastasia Beverly Hills Smooth Blur Powder Bronzer in Tropical Tan, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Liquid Bronzer & Contour in 1 Fair. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade1 FairClosest overall alternativeTropical TanHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall78
Colour55%76#916d51#956f5cClose colourColour difference 4.2 (0 is identical)
Depth25%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared70
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%40Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNormal, CombinationSome differenceBoth marketed for combination, normal skin
Overall match 76/100Shade match 78/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $34 more
