Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: neutral/olive undertone, natural finish for tan skin tones
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Normal, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: Medium to tan with warm golden undertones
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims hydration
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim comfort· Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: deep tan with warm bronzer and cool contour
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: natural skin-like finish for dark skin tones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than bronze
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warm golden undertone, natural finish for medium skin tones
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: light-medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Normal, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: Tan to deep with warm undertones
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Claims transfer resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than bronze
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: very tan deep with neutral bronze undertones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format)
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than bronze
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than bronze · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format)
Use as bronzer: possible
Retailer shade note: medium brown with cool undertones
NARS Laguna Bronzing Cream in Laguna 03, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Liquid Bronzer & Contour in 1 Fair. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade1 FairClosest matchLaguna 03How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour55%94#916d51#976f51Very close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Depth25%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared87
Finish50%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Pigmentation25%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%60LiquidCreamSome differenceCream rather than liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 91/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $16 more
