Camo Liquid Bronzer & Contour 8 Deep dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.6 (16,298)·Brown · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: natural· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Bronze rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Bronze rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Golden rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warm golden undertone, natural finish for dark skin tones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· Bronze rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Bronze rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: medium-deep with warm undertones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Claims hydration· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Sold as blush, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: flushed crimson / tan to deep with warm undertones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Benefit Cosmetics Hoola Wave Bronzing Balm in Medium Deep, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Liquid Bronzer & Contour in 8 Deep. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade8 DeepClosest shade matchMedium DeepHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour55%94#7b4627#7e4427Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth25%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall81
Finish50%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%60LiquidCreamSome differenceCream rather than liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall55
Longevity50%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Clinique Chubby Stick Sculpting Contour Stick in Curvy Contour, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Liquid Bronzer & Contour in 8 Deep. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade8 DeepClosest overall alternativeCurvy ContourHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour55%94#7b4627#7f492dVery close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth25%97Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 2.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall78
Finish50%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%45LiquidStickSome differenceStick rather than liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 89/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $24 more
