Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same format: liquid· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: liquid· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warm golden undertone, natural finish for dark skin tones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims hydration
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim comfort· Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warm undertone, natural finish for medium to tan skin tones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: natural· Claims hydration
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Sold as blush, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: raspberry mauve / tan to deep with neutral undertones
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: medium-deep with warm undertones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than bronze· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warm undertone, natural finish for deep skin tones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: a warm red shade for deep skin tones
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (possible)
Retailer shade note: deep with cool bronzer and cool contour
Morphe Cheek Thrills Bronze & Tone Duo in Rio Carnival, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Liquid Bronzer & Contour in 4 Light/Medium. Matched on the lighter bronzer pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade4 Light/MediumClosest matchRio CarnivalHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour55%93#7c4f3c#7d4e3fVery close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth25%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared74
Finish50%78NaturalMatteCloseMatte finish rather than natural
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%—not comparableLiquidNot listedNot listed for eitherFormat not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 88/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $5.49 more
Sephora
