Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Claims hydration· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Sold as blush, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: true fuchsia / deep with warm undertones
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format)
Use as bronzer: possible
Retailer shade note: deep with warm bronze undertone
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Claims waterproof· Claims hydration
Differences: Mauve rather than brown· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than brown · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (possible)
Retailer shade note: contour for deep to very deep skin
Differences: Lighter· Bronze rather than brown· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
58
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Bronze rather than brown · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: liquid· Claims hydration· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than brown· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than brown · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warm undertone, natural finish for deep skin tones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Claims transfer resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Visibly different colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Use as bronzer: possible
Retailer shade note: rich to very rich neutral undertone
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Bronze rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Bronze rather than brown · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format)
DIBS Beauty Desert Island Duo Blush + Bronzer Stick in Shade 7 - That Girl / Bold Move, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Liquid Bronzer & Contour in 10.5 Rich. Matched on the Bold Move pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade10.5 RichClosest shade matchShade 7 - That Girl / Bold MoveHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour55%80#422c24#45271cClose colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth25%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall78
Finish50%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%45LiquidStickSome differenceStick rather than liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 77/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Morphe Cheek Thrills Bronze & Tone Duo in Rio Carnival, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Liquid Bronzer & Contour in 10.5 Rich. Matched on the deeper bronzer pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade10.5 RichClosest overall alternativeRio CarnivalHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour55%70#422c24#48261dClose colourColour difference 4.9 (0 is identical)
Depth25%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared74
Finish50%78NaturalMatteCloseMatte finish rather than natural
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%—not comparableLiquidNot listedNot listed for eitherFormat not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 81/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $20 more
