Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Bronze rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: liquid· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than rose· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than rose · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Matches: Same format: liquid· Claims hydration· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Bronze rather than rose· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than rose · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Claims hydration· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Sold as blush, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: rich berry / deep with warm-neutral undertones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Claims hydration· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Sold as blush, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: true fuchsia / deep with warm undertones
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than rose· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than rose · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Claims hydration· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than rose · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Bronze rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
41
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Bronze rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format)
Use as bronzer: possible
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral bronze undertone
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than rose· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than rose · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
24
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
27
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than rose · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
30
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Visibly different colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: deep to rich with a neutral red undertone
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
23
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warm undertone, natural finish for deep skin tones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Claims transfer resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
30
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Dior Forever Skin Contour Stick in 04 Deep, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Liquid Bronzer & Contour in 11 Rich. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade11 RichClosest shade match04 DeepHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour55%94#3a2326#3f282aVery close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth25%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Pigmentation25%30OpaqueSheerDifferentSheer rather than opaque
Format25%45LiquidStickSome differenceStick rather than liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 3 compared61
Longevity50%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 77/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Natasha Denona Hy-Sculpt Liquid Bronzer in Fling, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Liquid Bronzer & Contour in 11 Rich. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade11 RichClosest overall alternativeFlingHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall71
Colour55%48#3a2326#431b17Slight colour differenceColour difference 7.7 (0 is identical)
Depth25%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 80/100Shade match 71/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $20 more
