Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warm golden undertone, natural finish for dark skin tones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warm undertone, natural finish for medium to tan skin tones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims hydration
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim comfort· Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Claims hydration· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Sold as blush, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: soft terracotta / light to tan with warm undertones
Matches: Same format: liquid· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: neutral/olive undertone, natural finish for tan skin tones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: natural skin-like finish for dark-deep skin tones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Deeper· Brown rather than bronze· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Milk Makeup Creamy Matte Hydrating Bronzer Stick with Hyaluronic Acid in Blazed, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Liquid Bronzer & Contour in 3 Light. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade3 LightClosest matchBlazedHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour55%89#885736#83563cVery close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth25%98Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 1.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family20%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall67
Finish50%78NaturalMatteCloseMatte finish rather than natural
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%45LiquidStickSome differenceStick rather than liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%60Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNormal, Dry, CombinationSome differenceBoth marketed for combination, dry, normal skin
Overall match 87/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.