Camo Powder Foundation Rich 620 N dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.0 (1,097)·Very deep · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deepest with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than full coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
20
Close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for dry/normal/oily/sensitive skin
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Buildable rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: richest with neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
20
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/dry/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Same full coverage· Claims transfer resistance· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: D7 - very deep with neutral undertones and an olive tone
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: for very deep skin with rosy undertones
The closest shade to e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Powder Foundation Rich 620 N (Very deep · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Tarte Maracuja Juicy Glow Tint in 57S Rich Sand, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Powder Foundation in Rich 620 N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRich 620 NClosest shade match57S Rich SandHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%93#6c4936#6c462fVery close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Overall match 80/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
BLK/OPL TRUE COLOR Skin Perfecting Stick Foundation SPF 15 in Carob, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Powder Foundation in Rich 620 N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRich 620 NClosest overall alternativeCarobHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%88#6c4936#71472fVery close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Overall match 92/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.