Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same natural finish· Same full coverage· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: tan to deep skin with very warm, rosy undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Same full coverage· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
28
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal/oily skin
Matches: Same natural finish· Same full coverage· Both claim 24-hour wear
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
33
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones
$16.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$21.01 less (55%)4.4 (832)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Radiant rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal/dry/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
$10.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$27.01 less (71%)4.1 (2,823)
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Natural finish
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal/dry/oily skin
$31Ulta Beauty(product price)$7 less (18%)4.3 (1,273)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Luminous rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Luminous · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Luminous rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: for dark cool skin with red undertones
$16.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$21.01 less (55%)4.4 (832)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal/dry/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal/dry/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
The closest shade to Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place 24-Hour Concealer 5.5N (Deep tan · Cool undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Long-Wear Blur Concealer in 14 Deep, against Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place 24-Hour Concealer in 5.5N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade5.5NClosest match14 DeepHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%91#a76a46#a76748Very close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Transfer resistance20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall100
Skin type100%100Normal, dry, oilyNormal, dry, oilyBoth marketed for normal/dry/oily skin
Overall match 88/100Shade match 94/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $1 more
