Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Olive rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Olive rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for tan to deep skin with neutral olive undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Olive rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Olive rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: tan to deep skin with very warm, golden or olive undertones
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$30 less (79%)4.2 (5,664)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same full coverage· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: deep w/ rich golden undertone - online only
$31Ulta Beauty(product price)$7 less (18%)4.3 (1,273)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Luminous rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Luminous · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Luminous rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: for dark neutral skin with peach undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than natural finish· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than natural finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with warm, golden undertones
The closest shade to Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place 24-Hour Concealer 5W (Tan · Warm · golden undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Glossier Stretch Concealer for Dewy Buildable Coverage in Medium Tan 4, against Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place 24-Hour Concealer in 5W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade5WClosest shade matchMedium Tan 4How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%96#b37845#b27646Looks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99TanTanSameDepth difference: 0.9
Retailer descriptionDeepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared62
Finish35%56NaturalRadiantSome differenceRadiant finish rather than natural
Coverage30%80FullBuildableCloseBuildable coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared61
Longevity30%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Normal, dry, oilyNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 81/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser in WN 118 Amber, against Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place 24-Hour Concealer in 5W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade5WClosest overall alternativeWN 118 AmberHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%90#b37845#b27e4fVery close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97TanTanSameDepth difference: 2.1
Retailer descriptionDeepDeepBoth described as deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared93
Finish35%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Coverage30%80FullMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall100
Skin type100%100Normal, dry, oilyNormal, dry, oilyBoth marketed for normal/dry/oily skin
Overall match 88/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$23.01 less (61%)
