Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$39.01 less (75%)4.4 (41,209)
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Slightly deeper· Warm rather than olive undertone· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Warm rather than olive undertone · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: warm nude with yellow undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: buff beige with neutral undertones
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
90
Colour not compared · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Light rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Described as light medium, yours as medium· Warm rather than olive undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Described as light medium, yours as medium · Warm rather than olive undertone · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: for light to medium skin with warm undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light medium, yours as medium
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Described as light medium, yours as medium· Neutral rather than olive undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Described as light medium, yours as medium · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: for light to medium skin with neutral undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light medium, yours as medium
The closest shade to Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place Matte Powder Foundation 3W1.5 Fawn (Very fair · Olive · warm olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Rare Beauty True to Myself Natural Matte Longwear Foundation in 10 Light Warm, against Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place Matte Powder Foundation in 3W1.5 Fawn. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade3W1.5 FawnClosest match10 Light WarmHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%82#fbd09b#f7c799Close colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93Very fairFairCloseDepth difference: 3.7
Retailer descriptionMediumNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 82/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$39.01 less (75%)
