Double Wear Stay-in-Place Foundation 7C1 Rich Mahogany dupes and alternatives Estée Lauder
4.3 (20,395)·Deep · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims colour stability
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: deep skin with cool red undertones
The closest shade to Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place Foundation 7C1 Rich Mahogany (Deep · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Hydrating CC Cream SPF 30 in Deep 560 C, against Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place Foundation in 7C1 Rich Mahogany. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade7C1 Rich MahoganyClosest shade matchDeep 560 CHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%81#a05241#934c38Close colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%89DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 4.9
Retailer descriptionVery deepDeepSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 71/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Jane Iredale Beyond Matte Liquid Foundation in M15, against Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place Foundation in 7C1 Rich Mahogany. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade7C1 Rich MahoganyClosest overall alternativeM15How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%88#a05241#99523cVery close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 1.6
Retailer descriptionVery deepDeepSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared81
Finish35%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Coverage30%80MediumFullCloseFull coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%7036-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 36-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Dry, combination, oilyCombination, normal, oilyBoth marketed for combination/oily skin
Overall match 80/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$10 less (19%)
