All-in-Wonder Concealer + Foundation Espresso dupes and alternatives Fièra Cosmetics
Deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$30 less (67%)3.9 (223)
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Light rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: Dark skin tone, neutral-cool olive undertone
$18.49Ulta Beauty(product price)$26.51 less (59%)4.3 (1,381)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: deep with warm golden undertone
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Slightly deeper· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/normal skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep complexion with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Light rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Slightly deeper· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
$18.49Ulta Beauty(product price)$26.51 less (59%)4.3 (1,381)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
$42Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (7%)4.4 (2,174)
Matches: Same radiant finish· Claims 12-hour wear· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: deeper skin with warm, golden undertones
$41Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (9%)4.3 (1,733)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: deep with a neutral undertone
Matches: Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: dark with golden olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/normal skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: ultra deep with neutral-warm undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/normal/sensitive skin
$35Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (22%)4.5 (1,573)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than medium coverage · Not marketed for dry/oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep with warm olive undertones
The closest shade to Fièra Cosmetics All-in-Wonder Concealer + Foundation Espresso (Deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Hourglass Ambient Soft Glow Foundation in 15.5, against Fièra Cosmetics All-in-Wonder Concealer + Foundation in Espresso. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeEspressoClosest shade match15.5How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#744b2f#734b32Looks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 0.1
Retailer descriptionVery deepDeepSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 85/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Smashbox Dual Filter 2-In-1 Longwearing Concealer + Foundation in Dark Deep 33 Neutral, against Fièra Cosmetics All-in-Wonder Concealer + Foundation in Espresso. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeEspressoClosest overall alternativeDark Deep 33 NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#744b2f#794d34Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 1.8
Retailer descriptionVery deepDeepSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 89/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$30 less (67%)
