Eye Candy Eyeshadow Stick Sugar Coat dupes and alternatives florence by mills
4.8 (206)·Golden · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Palette rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$5 less (36%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: matte
Differences: Taupe rather than golden· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than golden · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Brown rather than golden· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than golden · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than golden· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than golden · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as contour, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Differences: Deeper· Nude rather than golden· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Nude rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Kaja Eye Bento Bouncy Eyeshadow Trio in Neutral Moment, against florence by mills Eye Candy Eyeshadow Stick in Sugar Coat. Matched on pan 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSugar CoatClosest shade matchNeutral MomentHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%91#ba987c#b29278Very close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared23
Finish65%20MatteShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%35StickPaletteDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Overall match 65/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in SOFT OCHRE, against florence by mills Eye Candy Eyeshadow Stick in Sugar Coat. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSugar CoatClosest overall alternativeSOFT OCHREHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%75#ba987c#b69482Close colourColour difference 4.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 89/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $16 more
