Sparklestik Eye Crayon CHAMPAGNE SNOWFLAKE dupes and alternatives Half Magic
4.0 (219)·Golden · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$19 less (73%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone
Differences: Taupe rather than golden· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than golden · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: icy taupe with silver and pink pinpoints
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Nude rather than golden· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Nude rather than golden · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: modern beige, java jazz, & cocoa dip
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
RMS Beauty Eyelights Cream Eyeshadow in Moondust, against Half Magic Sparklestik Eye Crayon in CHAMPAGNE SNOWFLAKE. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCHAMPAGNE SNOWFLAKEClosest matchMoondustHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%84#d7c5b7#e3cab7Close colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94LightLightSameDepth difference 3.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared85
Finish65%85ShimmerMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%85StickCreamCloseCream rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared81
Longevity50%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Overall match 85/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $9 more
Sephora
