Sparklestik Eye Crayon FAUXBOT dupes and alternatives Half Magic
4.0 (219)·Taupe · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Overall match 71/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
NARS Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick in Living Sin, against Half Magic Sparklestik Eye Crayon in FAUXBOT. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFAUXBOTClosest overall alternativeLiving SinHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%88#a18178#a88274Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared97
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%85StickCreamCloseCream rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall78
Longevity50%8012-hour wear16-hour wearClose16-hour wear claimed against 12-hour wear
Overall match 90/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.