Triclone Skin Tech Hydrating + De-puffing Concealer 10 Light Golden dupes and alternatives Haus Labs
3.9 (3,283)·Light medium · Warm · golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light medium skin with warm yellow undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
33
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light medium skin with warm olive undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
33
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light medium skin with warm olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light skin with warm olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light skin with warm olive undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same natural finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: fair skin with warm yellow undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light medium skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly deeper· Olive rather than warm undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Olive rather than warm undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light medium skin with warm olive undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same natural finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light medium skin with warm undertones
The closest shade to Haus Labs Triclone Skin Tech Hydrating + De-puffing Concealer 10 Light Golden (Light medium · Warm · golden undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Dior Forever Skin Correct Full-Coverage Concealer in 2W Warm, against Haus Labs Triclone Skin Tech Hydrating + De-puffing Concealer in 10 Light Golden. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade10 Light GoldenClosest match2W WarmHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#d8b088#dcb189Looks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared81
Finish35%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Coverage30%80MediumFullCloseFull coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared54
Longevity30%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall33
Skin type100%33Normal, dry, oilyNormalBoth marketed for normal skin
Overall match 84/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $10 more
Sephora
