Triclone Skin Tech Hydrating + De-puffing Concealer 52 Deep Neutral dupes and alternatives Haus Labs
3.9 (3,283)·Very deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for very deep skin with neutral cool undertones
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$19.01 less (59%)4.3 (3,814)
Matches: Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for deep skin with neutral to golden undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: deepest with golden undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
33
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: Deep with neutral warm undertones
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$19.01 less (59%)4.3 (3,814)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly cooler undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly cooler undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: very deep with rosy undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deeper skin with very warm, rosy undertones
The closest shade to Haus Labs Triclone Skin Tech Hydrating + De-puffing Concealer 52 Deep Neutral (Very deep · Neutral undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Long-Wear Blur Concealer in 16 Deep, against Haus Labs Triclone Skin Tech Hydrating + De-puffing Concealer in 52 Deep Neutral. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade52 Deep NeutralClosest shade match16 DeepHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%73#60443c#653e30Close colourColour difference 4.5 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared66
Finish35%56NaturalMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than natural
Coverage30%60MediumFullSome differenceFull coverage rather than medium
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared51
Longevity30%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall100
Skin type100%100Normal, dry, oilyNormal, dry, oilyBoth marketed for normal/dry/oily skin
Overall match 75/100Shade match 83/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
IT Cosmetics Bye Bye Under Eye Full Coverage Anti-Aging Water-Resistant Concealer in 45.5 Deep Ebony, against Haus Labs Triclone Skin Tech Hydrating + De-puffing Concealer in 52 Deep Neutral. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade52 Deep NeutralClosest overall alternative45.5 Deep EbonyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall79
Colour60%82#60443c#69483aClose colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Overall match 76/100Shade match 79/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $6 more
