Ambient Lighting Blush At Night dupes and alternatives Hourglass
4.5 (2,379)·Red · Warm · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Brown / nude rather than red· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than red · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Brown / nude rather than red· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than red · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: deep rose bronze with shimmer
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Berry rather than red· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Berry rather than red · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Terracotta rather than red· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than red · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Terracotta rather than red· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than red · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than red· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than red · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Pink rather than red· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
90
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Pink rather than red · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Berry rather than red· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Berry rather than red · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Claims hydration
Differences: Mauve rather than red· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than red · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim comfort· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Berry rather than red · Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Rose rather than red· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than red · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
52
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Plum rather than red· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 26% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than red · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: A burgundy with golden shimmer
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Brown / nude rather than red· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than red · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Yves Saint Laurent Make Me Blush Longwear Natural Glow Cream Blush in 65 Strawberry Seduction, against Hourglass Ambient Lighting Blush in At Night. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAt NightClosest shade match65 Strawberry SeductionHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour55%76#a04447#b33744Close colourColour difference 4.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100RedRedSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared74
Finish50%78DewySatinCloseSatin finish rather than dewy
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%—not comparableNot listedCreamNot listed for eitherFormat not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 76/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Glow Play Cushiony Blush in Plush Pepper, against Hourglass Ambient Lighting Blush in At Night. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAt NightClosest overall alternativePlush PepperHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall74
Colour55%73#a04447#ae4554Close colourColour difference 4.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 3.9 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 77/100Shade match 74/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$35.01 less (73%)
